A Comparative Study of Human Characteristics in the Thought of René Descartes and Paulo Freire and a Critique Based on the Anthropological Foundations of the Fundamental Reform Document of Education in the Islamic Republic of Iran
Keywords:
Organizational justice, Iranian public education, PLS, SEM, distributive justice, procedural justice, interpersonal justice, informational justiceAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to compare the anthropological characteristics of the human being in Cartesian modern thought and Freirean postmodern/critical thought and to critically evaluate them based on the anthropological foundations of Iran’s Fundamental Reform Document of Education.
Methodology: This qualitative, fundamental–analytical study adopted a descriptive–interpretive approach. Data were collected through qualitative meta-synthesis of authoritative texts, including Descartes’ major philosophical works, Freire’s foundational educational writings, and the official text of the Fundamental Reform Document of Education. Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis with open, axial, and selective coding. Frankena’s practical syllogism model was employed to distinguish descriptive propositions, normative propositions, and foundational principles for systematic comparison and normative critique.
Findings: The findings indicate that Cartesian anthropology emphasizes foundational rationality, the self-grounding subject, mind–body dualism, and epistemic individualism, resulting in the marginalization of social and spiritual dimensions. Freirean anthropology conceptualizes the human being as historical, social, and becoming, highlighting critical consciousness, dialogue, social praxis, and justice, while lacking a systematic articulation of the human–God relationship. The Fundamental Reform Document proposes an integrative anthropological model that recognizes rational, moral, spiritual, social, and physical dimensions, emphasizing divine nature, human dignity, social responsibility, and the integration of reason and faith.
Conclusion: The study concludes that the Fundamental Reform Document of Education offers a comprehensive and normative anthropological alternative that transcends the reductionisms of modern and postmodern paradigms by rearticulating human rationality, social engagement, and spirituality within a coherent ethical and theological framework.
Downloads
References
Bagheri, K. (2019). Education and Culture. Roshd Publications.
Barandak, B., Babaei Agdam, I., & Mahmoudzadeh, S. (2022). Human-centeredness in the transition from modern philosophy to phenomenology. Fundamental Western Studies, 12(2), 1-24. https://journals.ihcs.ac.ir/article_7720.html?lang=en
Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1997). Postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. Guilford Press. https://archive.org/details/postmoderntheory0000best
Copleston, F., & Bashirieh, H. (2018). A History of Western Philosophy (Vol. 8: Bentham to Russell). Elmi va Farhangi. https://dhspriory.org/kenny/PhilTexts/Copleston/HistoryPhilosophy1.pdf
Descartes, R., & Cottingham, J. (1996). Meditations on First Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805028
Ebrahimkhani, M., & Ajam, M. (2022). Critique and analysis of the epistemological components of postmodernism and its educational implications in education. Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(3), 110-128. https://jonapte.ir/pdfdownloadfile/124775231968571542abf0a
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum. https://files.libcom.org/files/Paulo%20Freire,%20Myra%20Bergman%20Ramos,%20Donaldo%20Macedo%20-%20Pedagogy%20of%20the%20Oppressed,%2030th%20Anniversary%20Edition%20(2000,%20Bloomsbury%20Academic).pdf
Hutcheon, L. (2022). A Theory of Postmodernism: The Politics of Style. Routledge. https://eclass.asfa.gr/modules/document/file.php/AHT4126/linda%20hutcheon%20-%20The%20Politics%20of%20Postmodernism%20Parody%20and%20History.pdf
Jimson, F. (2025). Postmodernism, or the logic of late capitalist culture: The relationship between late capitalism and postmodern culture. Journal of Contemporary Cultural Analysis, 9(1), 7-55. https://web.education.wisc.edu/halverson/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2012/12/jameson.pdf
Magnarla, P. (2025). Contemporary developments in modern cultural anthropology: A review of symbolic theories, structuralism, and phenomenological anthropology centering on mind and cultural experience. Journal of Cultural Anthropology, 12(3), 145-168.
Ministry of Education. (2011). Fundamental Reform Document of Education in the Islamic Republic of Iran. https://sccr.ir/Files/6609.pdf
Moll, Y. (2023). Can there be a Godly Ethnography? Islamic Anthropology. American Anthropologist, 125(4), 560-574. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13911
Nabi, M., Mirsepasi, A., & Zamani Moghadam, M. (2024). General policies of the Fundamental Reform Document in creating change in the education system and pathology of the current situation. Strategic and Macro Policies, 12(46), 364-391. https://www.jmsp.ir/article_180797.html
Nezhad-Iran, M. (2023). Analyzing the existentialist roots of Shariati's religious anthropology. Essays in Philosophy of Religion, 12(1), 29-58. https://journal.philor.org/article_712636.html
Ranginkaman, M., & Darzi, G. (2025). Multi-component analysis of human action in the Quran based on cognitive-behavioral theory and interpretive approaches. Islamic Studies and Quranic Research in the Contemporary World. https://iscw.isqs.ir/article_724405.html
Taheri, M. H., & Jalali, M. (2018). Philosophical foundations of the modernity paradigm and contemporary human rights in Descartes' philosophy. Parto-ye Kherad, 15(9), 13-42. http://pkd.journals.miu.ac.ir/article_6403.html
Taheri Sarteshnizi, I., & Azizkhani, A. (2019). Postmodern anthropology and its critique from the perspective of religious teachings. Journal of Philosophical Research in Islamic Education, 4(2), 75-94. https://raj.smc.ac.ir/article_2293.html
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674824263
Downloads
Publication Timeline
- Submitted
- Revised
- Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bizhan Mohamadyari (Author); MohammadReza Sarmadi; Seyedeh Esmat Rasouli, HamidReza RezaZadeBahadori (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.